I think Batavius was referring to Hailing Frequency's Forum link endorsing Lotus Fleet as the official guild/fleet for Hailing Frequency. :)
I acknowledge that your views are perfectly valid Nova, however I do not share them.
I can know something about another fleet and still not be a member. For example, I have a lot of respect for 3rd Fleet. They are VERY well organized, their membership is very friendly. I would gladly nominate them for best fleet/guild, without feeling as if I were betraying my own fleet.
In a situation like this, it is impossible to have an "informed" decision, because unless you have been a part of each of the gaming groups, you have only been FULLY exposed to your own.
As far as I understood it, this is meant as a fun community activity, and not as a competition such as a candidate running for office, and so the analogy of candidates being forced to choose the other is invalid. There are far more options than just two candidates - there are hundreds of fleets within the community.
The community is largely composed of fleets and groups such as {UFP}, Lotus Fleet, 3rd Fleet, Ninth Fleet, etc. I would argue that by allowing members to vote for their respective fleets/groups, the majority of the rest of the community vote is fractured into votes for their own fleets. This would mean that the "majority" that the community holds is insufficient to counteract the numbers of larger clans such as {UFP} or Lotus Fleet, meaning that the smaller clans have a much smaller chance of getting noticed. I would hardly count that as "Win/Win".
If members were unable to vote for their own fleet, then voters would be able to choose which OTHER clan/fleet they feel is most deserving. This would mean that smaller fleets have an opportunity to share more of the headlight with larger clans, and it is MORE of a Win/Win scenario for everyone, and the community as a whole, since they would be exposed to new ideas and groups.